Reflections
When one branch of presidency becomes more powerful then another it is most probably just because that they stay in the most political power, which can be known as the opportunity to exert influence beyond your elected duties. When the framers laid the foundations for our particular nation in the form of the Constitution, it was not made explicitly clear which branch was supposed to hold the most power. The document simply granted the structure individuals government along with the powers connected with each branch (Nourse, 1999). If one branch were structured by the framers to carry more power in comparison to the others it could need to be the legislative branch since they are the insurance cover makers. Along with making then entire listing of laws, the legislative branch can also be crucial branch, comprising of 535 members total between House and also the Senate (Greenberg & Page, 2008). As Nourse (2000) suggests in his article, the structure of power between branches is better stare upon as a considerate vertical arrangement; having less to do with “the power to have a show documented tasks fitting a particular constitutional description” and more as “a pair of constitutionally created political relationships between the people and those that govern them”. This directly relates to the heated debate about whether or not the constitution should be a living and changing document, or it doesn t matter if it should remain exactly the same whilst society changes around it (Nourse, 2000). Technology and advances in human development, from medical care bills to electronic communications, has changed the landscape of legislative actions such that will have been impossible for framers to anticipate. The vast majority of new changes have contributed to the rising power of those judicial branch as well as the expanding role of activist judges. The Judicial branch has been on a steep uphill power climb since our nations founding. The momentum was really set into motion from the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in the event the “power of judicial review, as well as right to declare the actions of those other branches of government null and void if they are counter to the Constitution” was claimed from the Supreme Court (Greenberg &Page, 2008). Since this decision there indeed surely have been numerous cases which may have drastically changed policy in th usa purely from the decisions of Supreme Court justices. As we see in Federalist 78 by Alexander Hamilton, he highly doubted any extraordinary power of the judiciary branch as it have not have “force nor will” (Fed 78, 1787). When searching at what the judicial branch has morphed into today plainly Hamilton must have been a little off mark in saying that it the “least dangerous branch”. Starting all the way up back during the Civil Rights movement Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall emerged as a leading activist judge promoting and changing policy regarding racial discrimination. There indeed surely have been a range of cases that demonstrate judicial power and their skill to change policy. One notable case being Roe v. Wade in 1973, which decriminalized abortion. Abortion was not around, not less than publicly, back then of those Constitution’s forming and posed an entirely new group of questions regarding its constitutionality. Only one of these questions would be the proposed right to privacy, but is not explicitly mentioned anywhere in the Constitution (Greenberg & Page, 2008). plagiarism detection